1
前兩天接觸了一下朗盛的EVM
他們說這個東西在EPDM和硅橡膠之間的新橡膠,有兄弟們用過嗎
德國人還給我了個技術(shù)資料，不過全E版,里面有CPE和EVM EPDM等比較詳細資料和配方數(shù)據(jù)
如果大家有興趣,給我個郵件，我發(fā)過去去給大家看看
jlbjly@163.com
2
請發(fā)：goodwire@126.com
謝謝！
3
已經(jīng)發(fā)了,請查收哈. EVM在乃高溫還可以的,做150度的,乃老化的還不錯
另外，他不含鹵素, 阻燃要用ATH .
與CPE比,有如下特點 供參考
Let me summarize what we discussed:
The current compound is based on
-CM 135 B (a 35% Cl) Weipren CPE grade
-medium filled with silica and CaCO3
-peroxide cured with DCP and TAIC
-Sb2O3
-chloro-paraffin
properties/specifications:
tensile strenght 12 MPa
elongation 200%
flame retardent
10 MPas tensile and 200% elongation
LOI should be 39%
general purpose rubber cable jacket application
Problems:
Mooney too high
aging resistance not so good
smoke density high / high smoke toxicity ?
LOI need to be higher, 39% minimum
Please let me know whether I got the things right or not.
I see 2 options:
a. use a blend of Levapren and CPE
expected effect:
heat aging will improve
Mooney will decrease
Compression set will improve
Cpd can be higher filled
less HCl in the smoke, smoke density lower, due to the dilution effect
costs: slightly higher
b. use a formulation based on Levapren alone
effect:
halogen-free, environmetally friendly, broad acceptance
filler is ATH (9 to 12 m2 BET) at 150 phr with Levapren 700 HV
or at 190 phr ATH with Levapren 500 HV
LOI at ca 39%
high heat resistance, good compression set
low compound Mooney
costs: higher, the higher VA grade is generally more expensive but easier to make flame retardant.
Here I send you a study on blends of CM and CSM with Levapren EVM as background info. We have not yet done a study for a typical cable compound.
If you want to chose the blend option then I suggest to use a blend 50% CM and 50% Levapren 500 HV.
The filler composition should be changed: no silica, use CaCO3 40 phr and 100 phr ATH (6 m2 is ok here). The more ATH the higher the LOI. The silica will not contribute to the flame resistance.
Sb2O3 and chloroparaffine contribute to flame resistance but the smoke behavior is not good.
For the Levapren alone formulation you can use a Levapren 500 HV with the high ATH loading to achieve the necessary flame resistance. I can give you a more detailed recipe if you want to try this as well.
以上我和德國EVM技術(shù)經(jīng)理的交流郵件,他說出了他認為EVM與CPE的對比
我提出,EVM價格貴,阻燃不好阻燃 ,性價比比CPE差等原因,他郵件回復我的內(nèi)容
4
謝謝發(fā)過來吧wyj110288@163.com
5
我也想要啊兄弟,謝謝發(fā)lian_chunxun@163.com
6
切,朗盛公司的產(chǎn)品,基本都是缺貨,真正確定了該公司產(chǎn)品做主材,有定單而沒有貨源,會把人給逼瘋
7
先感謝兄弟,給我發(fā)一份:haizhouyin@vip.163.com
8
9
10
兄弟，能否把您中文的給我發(fā)一份，看起來方便點，謝謝！
11
12
發(fā)了
13
吉工,給我發(fā)一份吧,wangxueermail@163.com
14
15
16
17
我們曾做過核電站K1類樣品，用的是EVM 500，做無鹵阻燃護套，效果不錯，缺點是粘輥嚴重，阻燃性還可以，用的是MDH。
CPE的資料我沒有，能否給發(fā)一份，謝謝！
hgl_7094@sina.com
18
19
20
21
能否給我一份謝謝！ dzy8514@163.com
22
23
無機阻燃的強度、氧指數(shù)都比較理想，一般都能夠滿足標準 但是有機阻燃體系在強度方面就很麻煩啦
24
我也要 ~~~~~~
25
26
請給我發(fā)一份：LIUYUYUN@SINA.COM.CN
謝謝！
27
28
吉工我怎么沒收到呀
29
30
請發(fā)份中文的給我啊謝謝279349784@qq.com
31
請發(fā)份中文的給我啊謝謝279349784@qq.com